Cases 41 - 50 of 173
Payne et al v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv05574
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
James Payne and Lyneeta Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., et al.
as 1:2019cv02731
Defendant:
Chattem, Inc., Pfizer Inc, GlaxoSmithKline LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ms. Sandra Payne and Sandra J. Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
County Commission of Payne County, Oklahoma v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2019op45653
Defendant:
Beverly Sackler, Richard S. Sackler, Purdue Pharma L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
County Commission of Payne County, Oklahoma, The
Duarte-Payne et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00552
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ana Duarte-Payne and Robert Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Aramark Corp., et al
as 3:2019cv01514
Plaintiff:
Lowell N. Payne, Jr.
Defendant:
Aramark Corp., Anthony Franklin, Mary Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00504
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme, AstraZeneca LP, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02656
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carl Mincer and Danna Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv02278
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sharon Kay Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Federal Bureau of Prisions, et al.
as 4:2019cv01169
Plaintiff:
Tony Fisher and Kellie Rehanna
Defendant:
Dr. Deborah Schultz, Debra Giannone, C. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Payne v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00696
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ernest Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
