Cases 41 - 50 of 68
FAHLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv06871
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RAVEN FAHLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
RAVEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2020cv00749
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER RAVEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Vintage Raven, LLC et al v. Great Lakes Insurance SE
as 6:2019cv01909
Defendant:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Plaintiff:
The Vintage Raven, LLC and Mar T's LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
The Vintage Raven LLC et al v. Great Lakes Insurance SE
as 6:2019cv01911
Defendant:
Great Lakes Insurance SE
Plaintiff:
Mar-T's LLC and The Vintage Raven LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ALVAREZ et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03066
Plaintiff:
GARY LINDSEY, Rusty Carter, Robert Dyer and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pro Custom Solar LLC v. Blue Raven Solar, LLC
as 6:2019cv01305
Defendant:
BLUE RAVEN SOLAR, LLC
Plaintiff:
Pro Custom Solar LLC, d/b/a Momentum Solar and Pro Custom Solar LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LIEURANCE v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv02016
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
TRACY SPERANZO and RAVEN E LIEURANCE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Uppal v. Western Express Truck Company et al
as 8:2019cv00778
Defendant:
Keith Raven, Western Express Truck Company, Lavar Perry and others
Plaintiff:
Neelam Uppal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Raven Licensing LLC v. Hikvision USA Inc.
as 1:2019cv21211
Plaintiff:
Raven Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Hikvision USA Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
RAVEN LICENSING LLC v. NORTEK SECURITY & CONTROL LLC
as 4:2019cv00112
Plaintiff:
Raven Licensing LLC
Defendant:
Nortek Security & Control LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
