Cases 41 - 50 of 52
SOLIS v. DEBCO SPECIALTIES, INC. 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
as 2:2010cv04900
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
DEBCO SPECIALTIES, INC. 401(K) RETIREMENT PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
PURPURA et al v. SEBELIUS et al
as 3:2010cv04814
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS E. PURPURA and DONALD R. LASTER, JR.
Defendant:
KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, TIMOTHY F. GEITHNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SOLIS v. WEISS et al
as 2:2010cv03329
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
TODD WEISS, DAVID WEISS and COASTAL GROUP RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SOLIS v. LUI
as 1:2010cv03270
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
CHI-NGOK LUI
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
PIMENTAL et al v. KEYS SCHOOL, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv03060
Plaintiff:
MARISOL PIMENTAL , ESTELLA SOLIS , LUCINA SOLIS and others
Defendant:
KEYS SCHOOL, INC., MARTIZA LEGRA, JOHN ROE 1-5 (fictitious) and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
SOLIS v. KRAJACK TANK LINES, INC. et al
as 2:2010cv02694
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
KRAJACK TANK LINES, INC., 401(K) PLAN AND TRUST
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
SOLIS v. LOCAL LODGE NO. 2339-N et al
as 2:2010cv01891
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
LOCAL LODGE NO. 2339-N and INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0401
SOLIS v. COLLECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
as 2:2009cv06338
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
COLLECTIVE COMMUNICATIONS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SOLIS v. ABC WIRELESS, INC. 401(K) PLAN
as 1:2009cv05004
Plaintiff:
HILDA L. SOLIS
Defendant:
ABC WIRELESS, INC. 401(K) PLAN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
SOLIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2009cv02972
Plaintiff:
VICTOR SOLIS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
