Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv01117
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
American Automobile Association Inc v. AA'A Rent A Car et al
as 2:2013cv05309
Defendant:
AA'A Rent A Car and Does
Plaintiff:
American Automobile Association Inc
AA California Portfolio I LLC v. Edgar Borne et al
as 2:2013cv01759
Plaintiff:
AA California Portfolio 1 LLC
Defendant:
Agatha Borne, Edgar Borne, Jr, Edgar L Borne, III and others
Dubinsky v. TD Service Co
as 3:2011cv05751
Plaintiff:
Yevgeny Dubinsky
Defendant:
TD Service Co, Capital One, N.A. and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company as Trustee for BCAP 2007-AA-4 MIN 100015305560499141
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Aaron Pam et al v. Christopher James Bowman et al
as 2:2011cv04471
Plaintiff:
AA Hudson View, L.L.C. and Aaron Pam
Defendant:
Blue Horseshoe Tattoo Two, Ltd., Blue Horseshoe Tattoo V, Ltd., Blue Horseshoe Tattoo, Ltd and others
Fahed Sayegh v. John Enright, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv04794
Defendant:
AA Capital Partners, LLC, Does, First Security Mortgage Home Loans, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Fahed Sayegh
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Mitchell Porter & Williams Inc et al
as 2:2010cv01576
Defendant:
AB3 Inc, Thomas L Mitchell, Mitchell Porter & Williams Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
AA Rancho Inc. v. Conocophillips Company et al
as 5:2009cv02858
Plaintiff:
AA Rancho Inc.
Defendant:
ConocoPhillips Company, ConocoPhillips Company and Does
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801 Petroleum Marketing Practices Act
AA Rancho Inc. v. Conocophillips Company et al
as 3:2009cv00042
Plaintiff:
AA Rancho Inc.
Defendant:
Conocophillips Company and DOES
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Vo v. State Of California et al
as 5:2008cv05103
Plaintiff:
Dong Thanh Vo
Defendant:
State of California, Office of the Attorney General, Superior Court Santa Clara County, State of California and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
