Cases 41 - 50 of 94
MCCLENDON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv15353
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCLENDON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
WILLIAMS v. CONNORS et al
as 2:2018cv14769
Defendant:
ABC CORP., JOHN DOE, AMTRAK and others
Plaintiff:
MR. ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
REAMES v. AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 3:2018cv13295
Defendant:
AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, I-X, JOHN DOE I-XXX and others
Plaintiff:
REAMES JAMES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BAKSH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv14761
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
FAREED BAKSH
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
DEFEO et al v. COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX et al
as 2:2018cv11428
Defendant:
BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, NEW JERSEY TRANSIT, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION d/b/a Amtrak and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL V DEFEO and PATRICIA DEFEO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEDLOW et al v. CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 1:2018cv09203
Plaintiff:
WILLAIM PEDLOW and ANNMARIE PEDLOW
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, COUNTY OF MIDDLESEX, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PEDLOW et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., D/B/A AMTRAK
as 1:2018cv09199
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PEDLOW and ANNMARIE PEDLOW
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP., D/B/A AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
MAYERS v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv06105
Plaintiff:
SCOTT MAYERS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
JAWOROWSKI v. AMTRAK CORPORATION
as 2:2018cv04957
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN R JAWOROWSKI
Defendant:
AMTRAK CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
v. Jaworowski et al
as 2:2018cv04956
Defendant:
Justin R Jaworowski and AMTRAK NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
