Cases 41 - 50 of 240
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Franklin Partition Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv10605
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Franklin Partition Corp. , Hugh Hughes and Jeff Hughes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Prater Commercial Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv10260
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Prater Commercial Group, Incorporated and Rodney Prater
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund et al v. Creative Composites, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00169
Plaintiff:
Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund , Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund , Boilermakers National Annuity Trust and others
Defendant:
Creative Composites, Inc.
Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund et al v. Creative Composites, Inc.
as 2:2014mc00004
Plaintiff:
Boilermaker-Blacksmith National Pension Fund , Boilermakers National Health and Welfare Fund , Boilermakers National Annuity Trust and others
Defendant:
Creative Composites, Inc.
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 333 Health and Welfare Fund et al v. Hussman Corporation
as 4:2014cv12550
Plaintiff:
Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 333 Health and Welfare Fund , Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 333 Pension Fund , Plumbers and Pipefitters Local 333 Scholarship Fund and others
Defendant:
Hussman Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Authority Group Concrete, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11504
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Authority Group Concrete, Inc. and Gary L Czarnik
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund et al v. M.D.G. Enterprises, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv11466
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters' Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
M.D.G. Enterprises, Inc. and Michael D Grover
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. H.B. Stubbs Company et al
as 2:2014cv11393
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
H.B. Stubbs Company , H.B. Stubbs Company, L.L.C. , H.B. Stubbs Holdings, Inc. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. Kulbacki, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv10159
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters' Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
Kulbacki, Inc. and Joseph Kulbacki
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund et al v. J. Slagter & Son Construction Company et al
as 2:2013cv15013
Plaintiff:
Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Employee Benefits Fund , Michigan Regional Council of Carpenters Annuity Fund , Carpenters Pension Trust Fund - Detroit and Vicinity and others
Defendant:
J. Slagter & Son Construction Company , Cornelius W Slagter , Anne G Slagter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
