Cases 41 - 50 of 58
Buie v. Haffman et al
as 2:2017cv00738
Plaintiff:
Asua Buie
Defendant:
Mr Haffman, J Hernandez, K McKinzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Armor Correctional Staff et al
as 2:2017cv00459
Plaintiff:
Deshireo Tyveonce Rivers
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Staff, Armor Denial Staff and Aramark Kitchen Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellis v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 2:2016cv01242
Plaintiff:
Robert Antonio Ellis
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation, Milwaukee County Jail and Armor Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Wright et al
as 2:2016cv01240
Plaintiff:
Leon Eugene White, Jr
Defendant:
CO Wright , CO Sarosh, House of Corrections Health Care Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfell v. Winnebago County Jail et al
as 1:2016cv00517
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Winnebago County Jail, Marathon County Jail, Correct Care Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barfell v. Aramark Correctional Services
as 1:2016cv00440
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Aramark Food Service
as 2:2014cv01601
Plaintiff:
Mickey Miller
Defendant:
Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barfell v. Aramark et al
as 1:2014cv01162
Plaintiff:
Thomas H L Barfell
Defendant:
Aramark, Carrie Koepp, Sgt Parent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Dodge County Detention Facility et al
as 2:2014cv00804
Plaintiff:
Treble H Henderson
Defendant:
Dodge County Detention Facility and Aramark Correctional Food Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Miller v. Priebe et al
as 2:2014cv00516
Plaintiff:
Mickey Lee Joseph Miller, Jr
Defendant:
Sheriff Priebe, Captain Brinkman, Assistant Captain Bricco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
