Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Rue v. BNSF Railway Company
as 6:2012cv00056
Plaintiff:
Stacey Rue
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Rue v. BNSF Railway Company
as 5:2012cv00095
Plaintiff:
Stacey Rue
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Mills v. BNSF Railway et al
as 4:2011cv00599
Plaintiff:
Donald Mills
Defendant:
BNSF Railway, Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation, BNSF Railway Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BNSF Railway Company v. Morrison Grain & Ag Services Inc
as 5:2011cv00939
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Morrison Grain & Ag Services Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Beeler v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2011cv00492
Plaintiff:
Michael Beeler
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Richardson v. BNSF Railway Company
as 5:2011cv00689
Plaintiff:
Larry Richardson
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BNSF Railway Company v. Burrow Construction Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00293
Plaintiff:
BNSF Railway Company
Defendant:
Burrow Construction Inc , Ronald E Sinclair and Acadia Insurance Company
Counter_claimant:
Acadia Insurance Company , Burrow Construction Inc and Ronald E Sinclair
Counter_defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
W B Johnston Grain Company et al v. BNSF Railway Company
as 5:2010cv01239
Plaintiff:
W B Johnston Grain Company and Johnston Seed Company Inc
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Adams v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2010cv00671
Plaintiff:
Carl E Adams
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Oklahoma, State of v. BNSF Railway Company et al
as 4:2010cv00660
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma, State of
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company , Lamar Outdoor Advertising and Tulsa County Treasurer
Cause Of Action: 43 U.S.C. § 945
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
