Cases 41 - 50 of 466
Gibbs v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2023cv81100
Plaintiff:
Jacob Gibbs
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw, Thomas Burnside and Well Path
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADSHAW v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv16138
Plaintiff:
JAMES BRADSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CHANDLER-BRADSHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv15947
Plaintiff:
DANIEL CHANDLER-BRADSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KLAPP v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv13162
Plaintiff:
ADAM KLAPP, CHARLES KINNARD, DARRIUS PEARSON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Henriquez v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2023cv80828
Plaintiff:
Juan Pablo Henriquez, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ric L. Bradshaw, Deputy Haris, Corporal Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
BRADSHAW v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv10214
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BRADSHAW
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Knox, Jr. v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2023cv80630
Plaintiff:
Timmie Lee Knox, Jr.
Defendant:
Sheriff Ric Bradshaw, Ric Bradshaw and Deputy Sheriff Dustin Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443 cv Notice of Removal - Civil Rights Cases
Bradshaw v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 9:2023cv80544
Plaintiff:
Christy Bradshaw and Christy R. Bradshaw
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Opper v. Bradshaw
as 9:2023cv80504
Plaintiff:
Shaun Opper
Defendant:
Ric Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Beals v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2023cv80449
Plaintiff:
Robert Beals
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw, Thomas San Filippo and A. Tejada
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
