Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Rochester v. Nettles et al
as 3:2015cv00022
Petitioner:
Julian E. Rochester
Respondent:
Williams N. Nettles, B. Obama, Alan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Adams et al v. Diversicare Leasing Corp et al
as 1:2014cv02990
Plaintiff:
Allison Adams , Katherine Anderson , Ladawn Bailey and others
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp , Diversicare Management Services Co. , Advocat, Inc. n/k/a Diversicare Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Adams et al v. Diversicare Leasing Corp et al
as 2:2014cv02990
Plaintiff:
Allison Adams , Katherine Anderson , Ladawn Bailey and others
Defendant:
Diversicare Leasing Corp, Diversicare Management Services Co., Advocat, Inc. n/k/a Diversicare Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Bush v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv01243
Petitioner:
Musante Bush
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Maur v. Shelby County District Attorney's Office et al
as 2:2014cv02345
Plaintiff:
Assad Maur
Defendant:
Shelby County District Attorney's Office, Shelby County Public Defender's Office, Shelby County Criminal Court Clerk's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bush v. Donahue
as 3:2014cv00086
Petitioner:
Antonio Rafael Bush
Respondent:
Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bush v. Donahue
as 1:2013cv01326
Petitioner:
Antonio Bush
Respondent:
Michael Donahue
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bush v. Dickerson et al
as 1:2013cv01286
Plaintiff:
Carlos M. Bush
Defendant:
Dickerson, Veal, Ester and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Evans v. Smith County Sheriff Department et al
as 2:2013cv00106
Plaintiff:
Byron Evans
Defendant:
Beth Davis, Randy Glover, (f/n/u) Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
