Cases 41 - 50 of 339
WILLIAMS v. LAWSON et al
as 4:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
JUDITH MARCIA WILLIAMS
Defendant:
AL LAWSON, JR, RON DESANTIS, LORRAIN AUSLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Arbitrade Ltd. et al
as 1:2022cv23171
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Arbitrade Ltd., Cryptobontix Inc., Tory R.J. Hogg and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0077 Securities Fraud
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18790
Plaintiff:
BRADY SCOTT BARBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allison et al v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
as 9:2022cv81451
Plaintiff:
Barbara Allison, Martha Adkins, Greg Barber and others
Defendant:
Glaxosmithkline LLC, Pfizer, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17652
Plaintiff:
TYLER BARBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Geary v. Larry Barber Enterprises, Inc.
as 8:2022cv01936
Plaintiff:
Anthony Geary
Defendant:
Larry Barber Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Hooker v. Hernandez Covington et al
as 8:2022cv01862
Plaintiff:
Carlton Eugene Hooker, Jr.
Defendant:
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington, Thomas P. Barber and Steven D. Merryday
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv15776
Plaintiff:
BRETT BARBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14541
Plaintiff:
ZANE JOHN BARBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BARBER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12783
Plaintiff:
JOHN AARON JORDAN BARBER and JOHN AARON BARBER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
