Cases 41 - 50 of 66
L.A. Printex Industries Inc v. Tantrum Apparel LLC et al
as 2:2011cv04919
Defendant:
Bealls Inc, Burlington Coat Factory Corporation, Cohoes Fashions of New York LLC and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries Inc
Beall v. State Of Nevada
as 2:2011cv00272
Petitioner:
Ronald Wayne Beall
Respondent:
State Of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Quizz Sportswear, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv00799
Defendant:
Bealls, Inc., Does and Quizz Sportswear, Inc.
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Sabrina Lane et al v Bayer Corporation et al
as 2:2010cv09483
Plaintiff:
Maria Abalos, Rachel Alonzo, Adrianna Arambula and others
Defendant:
Bayer AG, Bayer Corporation, Bayer Healthcare LLC and others
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. California Blue Apparel, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv08885
Defendant:
Beall's Outlet Stores, Inc., California Blue Apparel, Inc., Does and others
Plaintiff:
L.A. Printex Industries, Inc.
Beall v. Quality Loan Service Corp et al
as 3:2010cv01900
Plaintiff:
Diane Beall
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corp, Onewest Bank, F.S.B. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Burleigh Point Ltd et al v. AJSE Inc et al
as 8:2010cv01235
Defendant:
AJSE Inc, Ivan Barenbaum, Bealls Outlet Stores Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Burleigh Point Ltd and GSM Operations Pty LTD
Quiksilver, Inc. et al v. Overseas Trading Group, LLC et al
as 2:2010cv04109
Defendant:
Ivan Barenbaum, Beall's, Inc., Conley National and others
Plaintiff:
Guru Denim, Inc. and Quiksilver, Inc.
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Bealls, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv03704
Defendant:
Bealls, Inc., Belk, Inc., Burlington Coat Factory Direct Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc.
LA Printex Industries, Inc. v. Belk, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv01060
Defendant:
Bealls, Inc., Belk, Inc., Bob's Stores Corp. and others
Plaintiff:
LA Printex Industries, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
