Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 73
Bennie Gamble, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al
as 13-6496
Plaintiff - Appellant: BENNIE L. GAMBLE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee: COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY, CORRECTIONS CORPORATION OF AMERICA, KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
In re: Bennie Gamble, Jr.
as 13-7173
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Bennie Gamble, Jr.
as 13-6284
Movant: In re: BENNIE L. GAMBLE, JR.
Respondent: GRADY PERRY
Gamble v. Bottom et al
as 5:2013cv00326
Plaintiff: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant: Don Bottom and Kentucky Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Conway et al
as 5:2013cv00327
Plaintiff: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant: Jack Conway, William Robert Long, Jr., Darren W. Peckler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Peckler et al
as 5:2013cv00328
Plaintiff: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant: Darren W. Peckler, Joni H. Terry, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv00317
Plaintiff: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant: Kentucky Department of Corrections, Don Bottom, Jack Conway and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2013cv00308
Plaintiff: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant: Commonwealth of Kentucky, Corrections Corporation of America, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gamble v. Bottom et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2013cv00270
Petitioner: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Respondent: Don Bottom, Kentucky Department of Corrections and Commonwealth of Kentucky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gamble v. Corrections Corp. of America et al
as 7:2013cv00082
Plaintiff: Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Defendant: Corrections Corp. of America, Grady Perry, Lanna Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?