Cases 41 - 50 of 74
Blank v. Williams et al
as 1:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
David Vern Blank
Defendant:
William Stephens, Pedro Gonzalez, Monte Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blank v. Chandler
as 4:2016cv00465
Petitioner:
Travis Blank
Respondent:
Rodney Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
The Diamond Consortium LLC et al v. Manookian et al
as 4:2016cv00382
Defendant:
Brian Manookian , Brian Cummings and Cummings Manookian PLC
Plaintiff:
The Diamond Consortium LLC and David Blank
Counter_claimant:
Brian Manookian , Cummings Manookian PLC and Brian Cummings
Counter_defendant:
David Blank and The Diamond Consortium LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blank v. Deutsch Bank National Trust Company
as 3:2016cv01463
Plaintiff:
Paul Casey Blank
Defendant:
Deutsch Bank National Trust Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The Diamond Consortium LLC et al v. Manookian et al
as 3:2016cv01352
Defendant:
Brian Manookian , Brian Cummings and Cummings Manookian PLC
Plaintiff:
The Diamond Consortium LLC and David Blank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Blank v. USA
as 4:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Travis Blank
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blank v. United States of America et al
as 4:2015cv00098
Plaintiff:
Travis Blank
Defendant:
United States of America, Regional Director Keller, Warden Chandler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Blanks v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00303
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lashell Blanks
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7405
Blank v. United States of America et al
as 4:2014cv00502
Plaintiff:
Travis Blank
Defendant:
United States of America, NFN Keller, NFN Younger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
