Cases 41 - 50 of 210
Mackey v. Cook, et al
as 3:2022cv05016
Plaintiff:
Vincent Robert Mackey
Defendant:
Ramirez Batile, Will, Allison Pachynski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maury v. Seamon et al
as 4:2022cv04463
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Maury
Defendant:
C. Seamon, Ron Broomfield and Connie Gibson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saif'ullah v. Allison et al
as 3:2022cv05017
Plaintiff:
Khalifah E.D. Saif'ullah and Fernando Jackson
Defendant:
Kathleen Allison, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. Broomfield et al
as 4:2022cv05126
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mills
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, Ralph Diaz, Ronald Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Watson v. Allison et al
as 5:2022cv04522
Plaintiff:
Rhone Watson
Defendant:
CDCR, CCHCS, San Quentin State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mackey
as 5:2022cv04341
Plaintiff:
Michael Mackey
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield, R. Reseler, Ron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Griff v. People of California et al
as 3:2022cv04090
Plaintiff:
Raymond W. Griff
Defendant:
People of California and Ronald J. Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)Reed v. Broomfield et al
as 2:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Monte Antonio Reed
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Newsome et al
as 4:2022cv04482
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson
Defendant:
Mayor Gavin Newsome, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hovarter v. Broomfield
as 4:2022cv04640
Petitioner:
Jackie Ray Hovarter
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
