Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Ramirez v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2014cv61500
Plaintiff:
Gene Ramirez
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office, City of Fort Lauderdale, Fort Lauderdale Fire Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Clarke, III et al
as 0:2014cv60773
Plaintiff:
Calvin Lovell Couch
Defendant:
John Clarke, III, City of Hollywood and Broward Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Llovera Linares v. Broward Sheriff's Office
as 0:2014cv60054
Plaintiff:
Rafael A Llovera Linares
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dixon v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2013cv62721
Plaintiff:
Charles W. Dixon
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office, Lawrence and Roque
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv08820
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayem v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2013cv62405
Plaintiff:
Hesham Abdul Dayem
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office, State of Florida, Stephens O'Neil and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arango v. Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc. et al
as 0:2013cv62148
Plaintiff:
Maximo Ramos Arango
Defendant:
Armor Correctional Health Services, Inc., Lotion Cream Company and Broward Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arango v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2013cv62147
Plaintiff:
Maximo Ramos Arango
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office and Reiley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pence v. Broward County, Florida et al
as 0:2013cv62050
Plaintiff:
Charles Pence
Defendant:
Broward County, Florida, Melvin Murphy and Broward Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanco v. Broward Sheriff's Office et al
as 0:2013cv61137
Plaintiff:
Anthony M. Stanco
Defendant:
Broward Sheriff's Office and U.S.G. 7 Transporters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
