Cases 41 - 50 of 741
Wilson v. Detroit, City of
as 2:2023cv11112
Plaintiff:
Sandra Wilson
Defendant:
City of Detroit, crystal anderson and Samuel Pionessa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Renard Austin, et al v. Michael Mosley, et al
as 23-1425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RENARD MONTEZ AUSTIN and URSULA COOK
Defendant:
MICHAEL MOSLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI
Ansari v. Jimenez et al
as 2:2020cv10719
Plaintiff:
Alexandre Ansari
Defendant:
Moises Jimenez and City of Detroit
Interested Party:
Wayne County Prosecutor's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kristal Scott v. City of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1407
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTAL SCOTT
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, DETROIT, MI POLICE DEPARTMENT, BRIDGETT LAMAR and others
Harris v. Detroit, City of et al
as 2:2023cv11170
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Detroit, Police Officer Jejuan Jetter, Police Officer Michael Dubac and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv11478
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Clifton Smith v. Cty of Detroit, MI, et al
as 23-1448
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CLIFTON SMITH
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF DETROIT, MI, JOHN DOE 1, Warden, in his individual and representative capacity, JOHN DOE 2, in his individual and representative capacity and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv10933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv10745
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Harris v. City of Detroit
as 2:2023cv11169
Plaintiff:
Christopher Harris
Defendant:
City of Detroit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
