Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Griffin v. Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv04656
Plaintiff:
W. A. Griffin, MD
Defendant:
Coca-Cola Refreshments USA, Inc. and United Healthcare Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
PETERS v. WALMART STORES EAST LP et al
as 1:2017cv00197
Defendant:
WAL-MART STORES EAST, LP, COCA-COLA BOTTLING CO. CONSOLIDATED, WALMART STORES EAST LP and others
Plaintiff:
JACKIE PETERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03891
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01852
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
The Coca-Cola Company v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's et al
as 1:2017cv01233
Plaintiff:
The Coca-Cola Company
Defendant:
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's and International Insurance Company of Hannover Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00840
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 626
Bryant v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP et al
as 2:2016cv00142
Plaintiff:
Erika L. Bryant
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores East, LP and The Coca-Cola Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Osterman v. Metasys Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv03686
Plaintiff:
Adam Osterman
Defendant:
Metasys Technologies, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02541
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Coca Cola Company
as 1:2016cv01241
Defendant:
Coca Cola Company
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC
Mediator:
Carol Cope and Lawrence A. Schwartz
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
