Cases 41 - 50 of 88
Johnson v. Campbell et al
as 8:2018cv03131
Defendant:
D.P.S.C.S., Warden Casey Campbell and Wexford Medical Services
Plaintiff:
Joseph Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Calhoun-El v. Campbell
as 1:2018cv02173
Petitioner:
James A. Calhoun-El
Respondent:
Warden Casey Campbell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Davis v. Discovery, Inc. et al
as 8:2018cv02261
Defendant:
Thelma Guiterrez, Rob Rosen, Discovery, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bret Davis and Scott Winfield Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratcliff v. Baltimore County Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv01650
Plaintiff:
Casey Edward Ratcliff
Defendant:
Baltimore County Police Department, Officer Brusio, Officer Stallings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Campbell et al
as 8:2018cv01921
Petitioner:
James Brown
Respondent:
Casey Campbell and Brian E. Frosh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Candy et al v. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv01549
Plaintiff:
Robert Candy , Animal Park, Care and Rescue, Inc. and Tri State Zoological Park of Western Maryland, Inc.
Defendant:
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, Inc. , Brittany Peet, Holly Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Best v. Campbell et al
as 8:2018cv01354
Petitioner:
Manuel Best
Respondent:
Casey Campbell and Maryland Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Casey v. Otis Elevator Company et al
as 1:2017cv03752
Plaintiff:
Sean C. Casey
Defendant:
Otis Elevator Company, Hilton Worldwide, Inc. and Park Hotels & Resorts, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James v. Wolfe et al
as 8:2017cv03627
Plaintiff:
Morteames James
Defendant:
Thomas Wolfe, John Kelson and Casey Campell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jarvis et al v. Chuck's Trading Post, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv03177
Plaintiff:
Casey Jarvis and Kevin Considine
Defendant:
Chuck's Trading Post, LLC and Bernard Dehaene
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
