Cases filed in New York
Cases 41 - 50 of 122
Winn v. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00359
Plaintiff: Chanell Winn
Defendant: Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer Pharma AG and Bayer OY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wigfall v. TD Bank, N.A. et al
as 2:2018cv00008
Defendant: Renee Naclerio, TD Bank, N.A. and Dominick Travato
Plaintiff: Chanel Wigfall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv09229
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12188
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv04790
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chanel, Inc. v. Richardson et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv04565
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: Kristin Richardson, Riscardo Torres and Full Service Ink, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Chanel, Inc. v. The Perfumed Court LLC et al
as 1:2017cv04482
Plaintiff: Chanel, Inc.
Defendant: The Perfumed Court LLC and Diane Weissman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Lugo v. Sabir
as 1:2017cv02552
Plaintiff: Chanel Lugo
Defendant: Rizwan Sabir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moody v. Jewish Board of Family and Children's Services, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01652
Plaintiff: Chanel Moody
Defendant: Jewish Board of Family and Children's Services, Inc. and Randy Palmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keita v. IBM et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01276
Defendant: Apple, BMW Manhattan, CBS and others
Plaintiff: Mohammed Keita
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bracker v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv06493
Plaintiff: Chanell Bracker
Defendant: City of New York and John Doe and Jane Doe 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?