Cases 41 - 50 of 51
GeoTag Inc v. Gucci America Inc et al
as 2:2010cv00571
Plaintiff:
GeoTag Inc
Defendant:
Gucci America Inc , Banana Republic LLC , Barnes & Noble Inc and others
Counter_claimant:
V E W Ltd , Vera Wang Bridal House Ltd , Chanel Inc and others
Counter_defendant:
GeoTag Inc
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Chanel, Inc. v. Rahman et al
as 4:2010cv01361
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Ziyad Mohammad Rahman, Does 1-10 and Ingrid Murray Rahman
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. Bunker et al
as 4:2010cv00508
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
Suzanna L. Bunker , Tammi C. Norris and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc. v. New York Hand Bag, Inc. et al
as 4:2010cv00451
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
New York Hand Bag, Inc. , Myung Je Lee and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Chanel, Inc v. Chon et al
as 4:2009cv03308
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc
Defendant:
Sang Jin Chon, M City Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Hall et al v. Dixon et al
as 4:2009cv02611
Plaintiff:
Chanel Hall and Chanel Hall
Defendant:
Scott Dixon, LaSandra Smith, Tonya Clay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chanel, Inc. v. Lewis et al
as 1:2009cv00197
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
James E. Lewis and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Chanel, Inc. v. Staley et al
as 4:2009cv00169
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc.
Defendant:
James C. Staley, Wholesale Gopher, L.L.C. and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2007cv04556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chanel, Inc v. Maslar et al
as 4:2007cv01033
Plaintiff:
Chanel, Inc
Defendant:
John Maslar, Sheryl Maslar and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
