Cases 41 - 50 of 95
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BARKSDALE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv01120
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT BARKSDALE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STUART F. DELERY, JOHN D. BATES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
SEITU v. HUNTWOOD PRESERVATION, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv00240
Plaintiff:
KWASI SEITU
Defendant:
HUNTWOOD PRESERVATION, LLC, TIMOTHY P. COLES, WENDELL GARDNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. COLVIN
as 1:2016cv00043
Plaintiff:
JERRY COLE
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MURPHY v. FEDERAL CORPORATION et al
as 1:2015cv02217
Plaintiff:
CAROL MURPHY
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORPORATION, JAMES E. FINCH, SCOTT A. RAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
COLE v. MAY et al
as 1:2015cv01991
Plaintiff:
DAVID COLE
Defendant:
WILLIE E. MAY, NATIONAL INSTITUTES FOR STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY, WILLIAM CRAIG FUGATE and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
COLE, JR. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 1:2015cv01946
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. COLE
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. WMATA et al
as 1:2015cv01408
Defendant:
WMATA, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JAMES M. COLE
Plaintiff:
JEROME BAY BROTHER JULIUS BROWN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BROWN v. WMATA, METRO TRANSIT POLICE et al
as 1:2015cv01409
Plaintiff:
JEROME BAY BROTHER JULIUS BROWN
Defendant:
WMATA, METRO TRANSIT POLICE, DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and JAMES M. COLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
BOVA et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2015cv01074
Plaintiff:
STEVEN P. BOVA , RICHIE BAKER , CORA FRYE and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
