Cases 41 - 50 of 57
Boardman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 2:2012cv00639
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Boardman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 6212
Ginn Doose v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue et al
as 2:2011cv09724
Respondent:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Mr John Dicicco and Mr William J Wilkinson
Petitioner:
Ginn Doose
Preece v. United States of America et al
as 2:2011mc00004
Petitioner:
Robert K. Preece
Respondent:
United States of America, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Brandi Bershell
Four Rivers Investments, Inc v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 5:2010cv05074
Plaintiff:
Four Rivers Investments, Inc
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7426 IRS: Wrongful Levy for Taxes
Seidel v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2010cv05073
Plaintiff:
Vicki Seidel
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
James Allen Gregoline v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 2:2010cv07953
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Plaintiff:
James Allen Gregoline
Spadafora et al v. United States Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service et al
as 5:2010mc80224
Petitioner:
Michael T. Spadafora and Karen K. Spadafora
Respondent:
United States Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service and L. Medeiros
Sivatharan Natkunanathan v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 8:2010cv01021
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Plaintiff:
Sivatharan Natkunanathan
Gjerde v. United States of America et al
as 2:2010mc00068
Petitioner:
Sean Patrick Gjerde
Respondent:
United States of America, Commissioner of Internal Revenue and Randall Zielke
Stanley Becker v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 2:2010cv04492
Plaintiff:
Stanley Becker
Defendant:
Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
