Cases 41 - 50 of 76
Janis Kaighn et al v. Richard Cheney et al
as 2:2015cv08339
Defendant:
Richard B Cheney, Carolyn Colvin, County of Sacramento and others
Plaintiff:
Greg Kaighn and Janis Kaighn
Coyle v. Geissler et al
as 3:2015cv02691
Plaintiff:
Simon G. Coyle
Defendant:
Peter S. Geissler and Geissler & Associates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Coyle v. San Diego County Sheriff et al
as 3:2015cv00831
Plaintiff:
Justin Sean Coyle
Defendant:
San Diego County Sheriff and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Amber Coyle et al v. Michael O'Rourke et al
as 2:2014cv07121
Plaintiff:
Amber Coyle and Jasmine Dustin
Defendant:
Does, Michael O'Rourke, O'Rourke Holdings, LLC and others
In re: Garrett Coyle
as 2:2014mc00527
In Re:
Garrett Coyle
Petitioner:
Garrett Coyle
Respondent:
United States District Court for the Central District of California
Ruben Arellano et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05638
Plaintiff:
Ruben Arellano, Evanury Arocho, Samuel Briggs and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Lois Hornsby et al v. Astrazenca Pharmaceuticals LP et al
as 2:2012cv10532
Plaintiff:
Ricky J. Aiello, Judy K. Arvin, Carol Bailey and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca LP, Astrazenca Pharmaceuticals LP, Cardinal Health 110, Inc. and others
J and J Sports Productions Inc v. Maeve Louise Coyle et al
as 2:2012cv09695
Defendant:
Maeve Louise Coyle and Maeves Residuals Incorporated
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions Inc
Coyle v. Cates et al
as 2:2012cv02446
Plaintiff:
Sean Nicholas Coyle
Defendant:
Matthew Cates, M. McDonald and "D" Facility Capt. Lt. Sgt.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
J and J Sports Productions Inc v. Maeves Louise Coyle et al
as 2:2012cv07854
Defendant:
Maeve Louise Coyle and Maeves Residuals Incorporated
Plaintiff:
J and J Sports Productions Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
