Cases 41 - 50 of 67
Mosqueda v. Drew et al
as 5:2009cv00503
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mosqueda
Defendant:
D. B. Drew and I. L. Negron
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hernandez-Cadena v. Kleckner et al
as 5:2009cv00464
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Hernandez-Cadena
Defendant:
M. Kleckner, R. McCollough, J. Agard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Mosqueda v. United States of America et al
as 5:2009cv00367
Plaintiff:
Carlos Mosqueda
Defendant:
United States of America, Harley Lappin, Ray Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Holmes v. Drew et al
as 3:2009cv00871
Petitioner:
Carl Jerome Holmes
Respondent:
D. B. Drew and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pinson v. Chipi et al
as 5:2009cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
E. J. Chipi, D. Montalvo and D. B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Hall v. Drew
as 4:2009cv00109
Plaintiff:
Melvin Hugh Hall
Defendant:
D. B. Drew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunwoody v. Drew et al
as 1:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
William Thatcher Dunwoody
Defendant:
D B Drew, T Garrow and M B White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pinson v. Pineiro et al
as 5:2009cv00244
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Michael Pineiro, D. B. Drew, Harley Lappin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Pinson v. Grimes et al
as 5:2009cv00238
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
J. Grimes, R. McCollough, L. Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dunwoody v. Drew et al
as 5:2009cv00222
Plaintiff:
William Thatcher Dunwoody
Defendant:
D. B. Drew, T. Garrow and M. B. White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
