Cases 41 - 50 of 61
D.M. Rothman Co., Inc. v. Skaros Food Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06931
Plaintiff:
D.M. Rothman Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Skaros Food Inc. and Kostas Hionas
Counter_claimant:
Skaros Food Inc. and Kostas Hionas
Counter_defendant:
D.M. Rothman Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499
Hernandez v. D.M. Unger
as 1:2013cv04706
Respondent:
D.M. Unger
Petitioner:
Charles Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Muhammad v. Rabinowitz et al
as 1:2013cv01831
Plaintiff:
Prince D.M. Muhammad
Defendant:
Steve Rabinowitz, Richard Miraglia and The Commission on Quality of Care
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fierman Produce Exchange, Inc. v. Maxsun Produce Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv07084
Plaintiff:
Fierman Produce Exchange, Inc. , Veg-Fresh, Inc. , J. Margiotta Company LLC and others
Defendant:
Maxsun Produce Corporation, Thomas Qi and Johnny S. Lin
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 499 Agricultural Commodities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08677
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
Lee v. Burker et al
as 1:2011cv02485
Defendant:
Isahia Allen Burker and D.M. Bowman, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Yong Jin Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Muhammad v. Rabinowitz et al
as 1:2011cv02428
Plaintiff:
Prince D.M. Muhammad
Defendant:
Steve Rabinowitz, Stuart M. Kirschner, Ph.D., Charles Smith, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00923
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401
D.M. v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2011cv00452
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
D.M. v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2011cv00453
Plaintiff:
D.M.
Defendant:
New York City Department of Education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
