Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Rivera v. Sturgill et al
as 7:2022cv00360
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
C. Weaver, Michael McBride, H.M. May and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Dowell et al
as 7:2022cv00368
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
T. Dowell, Harold Clarke, David Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Mathena et al
as 7:2022cv00370
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Defendant:
Dr. Mathena, S. Snow, Teresa Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AlBritton v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00306
Plaintiff:
DeVinche Javon AlBritton
Defendant:
David Anderson, Kimberly Phipps and Harold Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00426
Petitioner:
Terrence Mack Booth
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shelton v. Ford et al
as 7:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Shelton
Defendant:
Amanda C. Ford, B.L. Towler, B.W. Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Booth v. Anderson
as 3:2022cv00398
Petitioner:
Terrence M. Booth
Respondent:
David Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alston v. Robinson et al
as 7:2022cv00234
Plaintiff:
Ira Alston
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, Brittany Gross, B. O'Donnell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivera v. Anderson et al
as 7:2022cv00182
Defendant:
M. D. Sturgill, David Anderson, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Denis A. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lumumba et al v. Clarke et al
as 7:2022cv00080
Plaintiff:
Askari Dansa M.S. Lumumba, John Beverly, Anthony Shaw and others
Defendant:
Harold Clarke, A. David Robinson, David Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
