Cases 41 - 50 of 123
Parker v. Pickens et al
as 3:2022cv00543
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Pickens, Brandon Stubbs, Kleer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Cooke et al
as 3:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Diondrae L. Parker
Defendant:
Tasheena Cooke, William Reubart, David Drummond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. Roman et al
as 3:2022cv00474
Plaintiff:
Shane Brooks
Defendant:
Lt Roman, Lt Davis, Chet Rigney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberto Durand v. William Ruebart, et al
as 22-16582
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
WILLIAM RUEBART, ELY STATE PRISON, DAVID DRUMMOND and others
Roberto Durand v. David Drummond, et al
as 22-16469
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID DRUMMOND, DAVID ROGERS and CLARK COUNTY COURT
Welch v. Ruebart et al
as 3:2022cv00400
Plaintiff:
Kentrell D. Welch
Defendant:
William Ruebart, Charles Daniels, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Ruebart et al
as 3:2022cv00398
Plaintiff:
Marcell Williams
Defendant:
William Ruebart, David Drummond and Charles Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Welch v. Ruebart et al
as 3:2022cv00389
Plaintiff:
Kentrell Welch
Defendant:
William Ruebart, Roman, Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendoza et al v. Daniels et al
as 3:2022cv00369
Plaintiff:
Justin Mendoza and Roy Trost
Defendant:
Director NDOC Charles Daniels, William Ruebart, Tasheena Cooke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harris v. Dreesen et al
as 2:2022cv01231
Plaintiff:
Ammar Harris
Defendant:
F. Dreesen, Morin, Johnson and others
Interested Party:
Nevada Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
