Cases 41 - 48 of 48
DAWES v. DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY
as 3:2013cv03202
Plaintiff:
DURVEN DAWES
Defendant:
DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ACEVADO v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2012cv05899
Plaintiff:
CARMEN ACEVADO
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES/DIVISION OF CHILD PERMANENCY & PROTECTION, SAN L. PAYNE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv05855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00706
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BLACKWELL v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 3:2009cv03004
Plaintiff:
RENEE BLACKWELL
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES - DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, CHRISTINE MOZES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOVER et al v. LAURINO et al
as 2:2008cv04944
Plaintiff:
AUDRA HOVER and AUDRA HOVER
Defendant:
JANICE LAURINO, DENNIS CASTELLANO, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MELENDEZ v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES - DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES et al
as 2:2008cv01339
Plaintiff:
SHA-KAARII S. MELENDEZ
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES - DIVISION OF YOUTH AND FAMILY SERVICES, GLORIA CAMERON, SEBASTIAN ANTHONY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DINSMORE v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 1:2007cv06159
Plaintiff:
TODD BARONIEK DINSMORE
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY and DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
