Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Derrick Brown v. Matt Rodarmel, et al
as 10-3758
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MATT RODARMEL, Case Manager, TYRONE WALLACE, Federal Informant, E STEWART, Lieutenant and others
Brown v. Hepner et al
as 3:2010cv01785
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Defendant:
J. Hepner, M Edinger, Ivan Navarro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Derrick L. Brown v. Warden B. A. Bledsoe, et al
as 10-3425
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
B. A. BLEDSOE, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, DESIGNATION SENTENCE COMPUTATION CTR, BOP and others
In re: Derrick Brown
as 10-3101
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
RICHARD P. CONABOY
Brown v. Bledsoe et al
as 3:2010cv01424
Petitioner:
Derrick Lakeith Brown
Respondent:
B. A. Bledsoe, Harley G. Lappin, DSCC Chief and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Derrick Brown v. USA, et al
as 10-2895
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, F.B.O.P. Director, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, Warden and others
Derrick Brown v. David Olsheskie, et al
as 10-1962
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID OLSHESKIE, SCSS, et al, BRYAN A. BLEDSOE, Warden, et al, MAIL ROOM CLERKS-USP LEWISBURG and others
Derrick Lakeith Brown v. Mary D'Andrea, et al
as 10-1925
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY E. D'ANDREA, COREY WIMMER and LYNDA HANNICK
Derrick Brown v. David Kustoff, et al
as 10-1929
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID KUSTOFF, U.S. Attorney, GREG GILLULY, JR., U.S. Attorney, SAMUEL H. MAYS, U.S. District Judge and others
Derrick Lakeith Brown v. David Kustoff, et al
as 10-1452
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DERRICK LAKEITH BROWN
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID KUSTOFF, U.S. Attorney, GREG GILLULY, JR., U.S. Attorney, SAMUEL H. MAYS, U.S. District Judge and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
