Cases 41 - 50 of 127
Angel Torres v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-16292
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGEL TORRES
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Marvin Doleman v. Dwight Neven
as 18-71559
Petitioner:
MARVIN LEWIS DOLEMAN
Respondent:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden
Brandyn Gayler v. HDSP, et al
as 18-15706
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRANDYN WILLIAM GAYLER
Defendant - Appellee:
HIGH DESERT STATE PRISON, M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Jeffrey Depenbrock v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-15606
Petitioner - Appellant:
JEFFREY SCOTT DEPENBROCK
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Jose Alvarez v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 18-15516
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOSE IRAEL ALVAREZ
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Robert Wilk v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-17355
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT WILK
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, CARY LEAVITT and J. NASH
Victor Perez v. James Cox, et al
as 17-17140
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VICTOR PEREZ, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Carlos Perez, deceased; and as the Guardian Ad Litem for S.E.P. and A.I.P.
Defendant - Appellant:
JAMES GREG COX, TIMOTHY FILSON, DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and others
Defendant:
RAMOS, ISAIAH SMITH and CASTRO
Stanley Rimer v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-17086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STANLEY RIMER
Defendant - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, JENNIFER NASH, TIMOTHY FILSON and others
Bryan Ferguson v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-17056
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRYAN MICHAEL FERGUSON
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Robert Bellon v. Dwight Neven, et al
as 17-17005
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT LINZY BELLON
Respondent - Appellee:
DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
