Cases 41 - 47 of 47
Timbisha Shoshone Tribe v. Kempthorne et al
as 2:2008cv03060
Defendant:
Dirk A Kempthorne, George T Skibine, Don Gidner and others
Plaintiff:
Timbisha Shoshone Tribe
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Chaparral Texas LP v. W Dale Morris Inc, et al
as 08-20680
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
CHAPARRAL TEXAS LP
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
W DALE MORRIS INC and PAUL R GALLOWAY, JR.
Chaparral Texas LP v. W Dale Morris Inc, et al
as 08-20623
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
CHAPARRAL TEXAS LP
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
W DALE MORRIS INC and PAUL R GALLOWAY, JR.
Preservation of Los Olivos, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
as 08-56474
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRESERVATION OF LOS OLIVOS and PRESERVATION OF SANTA YNEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his official capacity as Secretary, DALE MORRIS, in his official as Pacific Regional Director and others
Defendant-intervenor - Appellant:
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Preservation of Los Olivos, et al v. United States Department of th, et al
as 08-56469
Plaintiff - Appellee:
PRESERVATION OF LOS OLIVOS and PRESERVATION OF SANTA YNEZ
Defendant - Appellant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DIRK KEMPTHORNE, in his official capacity as Secretary, DALE MORRIS, in his official as Pacific Regional Director and others
Defendant-intervenor:
SANTA YNEZ BAND OF MISSION INDIANS
Stop the Casino 101 Coalition et al v. Kempthorne et al
as 3:2008cv02846
Plaintiff:
Stop the Casino 101 Coalition, Stop the Casino 101 Coalition, Chip Worthington and others
Defendant:
Dirk Kempthorne, Carl J. Artman, United States Department of the Interior and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Cintas Corporation v. Alioto et al
as 3:2006cv05109
Petitioner:
Cintas Corporation
Respondent:
Brandon Alioto, Daniel S. Baldwin, David Baldwin and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. ยง 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
