Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Daniel Rodriguez v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2009cv05979
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue and Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniel Rodriguez v. Michael J. Astrue
as 2:2008cv03815
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Rodriguez v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.,
as 4:2009cv02939
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dalt Hotel, L.P. v. Rodriguez
as 3:2009cv02777
Defendant:
Daniel Rodriguez
Plaintiff:
Dalt Hotel, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Rodriguez v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2009cv02668
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Daniel Rodriguez et al v. Quality Loan Service Corp et al
as 5:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez, Daniel Rodriguez, Graciela Rodriguez and others
Defendant:
Quality Loan Service Corp, Quality Loan Service Corp, US Bank National Association and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Rodriguez v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2008cv05452
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
City and County of San Francisco and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. City & County of San Francisco
as 3:2008cv05257
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Rodriguez v. City & County of San Francisco
as 3:2008cv04645
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rodriguez
Defendant:
City & County of San Francisco
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
