Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Becker v. State of New Mexico Public Defenders Office et al
as 1:2014cv00379
Plaintiff:
Dion A. Becker
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Public Defender's Office, Jasmine Sullivan and Molly Kicklighter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Geter v. Chaves County Public Defenders et al
as 2:2013cv01035
Plaintiff:
Ruben Geter
Defendant:
Chaves County Public Defenders and Anna Marie Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv01021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Pistone v. State of New Mexico Public Defender Department et al
as 1:2013cv00920
Plaintiff:
Scott Pistone
Defendant:
State of New Mexico Public Defender Department and T. David Eisenberg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00398
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Salcido v. State of New Mexico et al
as 2:2013cv00348
Plaintiff:
Vicente Salcido
Defendant:
State of New Mexico and New Mexico Public Defenders Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olson v. City of Albuquerque et al
as 1:2013cv00231
Plaintiff:
David Brent Olson
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque, Albuquerque Police Department and Doe Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Inkies Sports, Inc. v. Facebook et al
as 1:2012cv01095
Plaintiff:
Inkies Sports, Inc.
Defendant:
Facebook, Inc., adSage Corporation, DHgate.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
O'Neill v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2012cv01084
Plaintiff:
Daniel O'Neill
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00769
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
