Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00017
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01364
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01302
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1447
Rongsuwan et al v. U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv01246
Plaintiff:
Pasakorn Rongsuwan and Phensitang Pookham
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Kimberly Zanotti and others
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01225
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Maradiaga et al v. Jaddou et al
as 1:2021cv01195
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Alexander Maradiaga and Mercedes Maradiaga Jovel
Defendant:
Director of USCIS Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Director, USCIS-WAS Kimberly Zanotti, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Ramirez Arnal v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2021cv01172
Plaintiff:
Fernando Henrique Ramirez Arnal
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, United States Department of Homeland Security, Secretary of DHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
