Cases 41 - 50 of 59
HB Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-24
as 1:2019cv06360
Defendant:
Does 1-24, John Doe 18, John Doe 23 and others
Plaintiff:
HB Productions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Clark v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv00440
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark, Sacorey Lennel Clark Trust and Secured Party Sacorey-Lennel
Respondent:
USA, United States Department of Justice, John Doe, 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clark v. United States et al
as 3:2019cv00297
Petitioner:
Sacorey Lennel Clark, Sacorey Lennel Clark Trust, Sacorey Clark and others
Respondent:
John Doe, 3, United States, John Doe, 5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Kruger v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2019cv00268
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, John Doe #11, Jacqueline Lashbrook and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Kruger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Unknown Party et al
as 1:2018cv05004
Defendant:
Jane Doe No. 22, Jane Does 1-10, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Harley M Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Unknown Party et al
as 3:2018cv01413
Defendant:
Jane Doe No. 22, Jane Does 1-10, Tarry Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Harley M. Brady
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bodyguard Productions, Inc. v. Does 1-19
as 1:2018cv02369
Plaintiff:
Bodyguard Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Does 1-19, John Doe 11 , John Doe 12 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Rosetto v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01131
Plaintiff:
Perry James Rosetto
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Randy Pfister, Salem Obaisi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Baldwin et al
as 3:2018cv00022
Plaintiff:
Terry Rogers
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Jacqueline A. Lashbrook, C/O Stout and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norwood v. Dart et al
as 1:2017cv05769
Plaintiff:
Randy Norwood
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, K. Johnson, Velez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
