Cases 41 - 50 of 70
DRAKE v. SALUTI et al
as 2:2017cv02643
Plaintiff:
KEITH H. DRAKE
Defendant:
GERALD M. SALUTI, NED ROSENBERG, J.S.C, JANICE MASSARO, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ASHLEY-DRAKE v. RUSSELL et al
as 2:2017cv02016
Plaintiff:
KEITH H ASHLEY-DRAKE
Defendant:
LESLIE R. RUSSELL and JOSH BURGOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown et al v. Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01047
Plaintiff:
Gertrude Brown , Jose Guardado , Robert Hazeltin and others
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC , JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv09068
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv08797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
STOCKALPER et al v. VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT et al
as 2:2016cv04346
Plaintiff:
DENA STOCKALPER , DAWN STANTON BLANCHARD , JAY MELMAN and others
Defendant:
VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC., AUDI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv03184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SATTIN v. DRAKES et al
as 1:2016cv02625
Plaintiff:
TIFFANY SATTIN
Defendant:
GEORGE DRAKES and JEAN GAETJENS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PRIMUS v. BONDS
as 2:2015cv05671
Petitioner:
DRAKE PRIMUS
Respondent:
WILLIE BONDS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ROMERO v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv05378
Plaintiff:
DRAKE JAMES ROMERO
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
