Cases 41 - 50 of 52
Feliz-Ayala v. Semple et al
as 3:2010cv00696
Plaintiff:
Eddy Feliz-Ayala
Defendant:
Scott Semple, R. Bouffard, Lieutenant Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paradigm Contract Mgmt Co, Inc v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins Co et al
as 3:2010cv00211
Plaintiff:
Paradigm Contract Mgmt Co, Inc
Defendant:
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins Co, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co, United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Webb et al v. Terex Corp et al
as 3:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
Eddie Webb and Binyam Ghebreghiorgis
Defendant:
Terex Corp, Ronald M. DeFeo, Chris Andersen and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Lewis v. Feliciano
as 3:2009cv02071
Petitioner:
Eddie P. Lewis
Respondent:
Feliciano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lilly v. Eddy et al
as 3:2009cv01710
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Lilly
Defendant:
Deborah Eddy and Eddy & Assoc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Mercado v. USA
as 3:2009cv01286
Petitioner:
Eddie Mercado
Respondent:
USA, USA, USA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv01954
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Figueroa v. Rosado et al
as 3:2008cv00910
Plaintiff:
Francisco Figueroa
Defendant:
Edwin Rosado, Joseph G. Bruckmann, John Smriga and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Lewis v. Sieminski et al
as 3:2008cv00728
Plaintiff:
Eddie Preston Lewis
Defendant:
John Sieminski, Christine Polce, Abraham Velez and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
