Cases 41 - 50 of 121
Lionel Patterson v. U.H.C. Hospital of Lafayette, et al
as 17-30954
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LIONEL PATTERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
U.H.C. HOSPITAL OF LAFAYETTE, ALLEN CORRECTIONAL CENTER, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Patterson v. U H C Hospital of Lafayette et al
as 6:2017cv01383
Plaintiff:
Lionel Patterson
Defendant:
U H C Hospital of Lafayette, Allen Correctional Center, Dept of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Poupart v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 17-30411
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL POUPART
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Guy Boudreaux, Jr. v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 17-30120
Petitioner - Appellant:
GUY BOUDREAUX, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Poiroux v. Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
as 3:2017cv00085
Defendant:
Elayn Hunt Correctional Center
Plaintiff:
Eric Poiroux
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Hooper et al
as 3:2016cv00875
Defendant:
Elayn Hunt Correctional Center and Tim Hooper
Plaintiff:
Elliott Hogan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarence Jack v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 16-31208
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLARENCE JACK
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Mark Savoy v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 16-31121
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARK JAMES SAVOY
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Brandon Dorsey v. Howard Prince, Warden
as 16-31082
Petitioner - Appellant:
BRANDON DORSEY
Respondent - Appellee:
HOWARD PRINCE, WARDEN, ELAYN HUNT CORRECTIONAL CENTER
Hammond v. New Orleans Police Department, et al
as 2:2016cv14822
Plaintiff:
Bobby Hammond
Defendant:
New Orleans Police Department, Elayn Hunt Correctional Center, Keva Landrum-Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
