Cases 41 - 50 of 593
Archer et al v. 3M Company et al
as 7:2023cv05775
Plaintiff:
Kevin Archer, Xavier Bailey, Logen Ball and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemical Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Doe v. Sequoia Capital et al
as 1:2023cv05881
Plaintiff:
Amber Doe
Defendant:
Sequoia Capital, Michael Lewis Goguen, Two Bear Capital and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Ellis et al v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05656
Plaintiff:
Aliyah Ellis and R. B.
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc., Costco Wholesale Corporation, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pl Diversity-Product Liability
Laskaris v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05461
Plaintiff:
Thomas A. Laskaris
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers and others
Jones v. PDC Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv05487
Plaintiff:
Brian Jones
Defendant:
PDC Energy, Inc., Mark E. Ellis, Barton R. Brookman and others
Rosenfeld v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05313
Plaintiff:
Zahava Rosenfeld
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, William F. Austen, Christopher L. Ayers and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Williams v. Arconic Corporation et al
as 1:2023cv05235
Plaintiff:
Robert Williams
Defendant:
Arconic Corporation, Frederick A. Henderson, William F. Austen and others
Ellis v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv05309
Plaintiff:
Erick Ellis
Defendant:
Doctor Kim, Dr. Bentivegna and Correctional Officer Boyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2023cv04629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
