Cases 41 - 50 of 96
Devere Construction Company, Inc. v. A. Bonamase Contracting, Inc. et al.,
as 2:2013mc00004
Plaintiff:
Devere Construction Company, Inc.
Defendant:
A. Bonamase Contracting, Inc. et al.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334 Bankruptcy Appeal
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al. v. Stotts Mechanical Insulation, Inc. et al.
as 2:2013mc00003
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund, et al.
Defendant:
Stotts Mechanical Insulation, Inc. et al.
Nexlink Communication, LLC v. Glassburn, et al.,
as 2:2012mc00047
Plaintiff:
Nexlink Communication, LLC
Defendant:
Nick Glassburn, et al. and Tower Wireless, Ltd.
Stooksberry v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al.
as 1:2012dp22098
Plaintiff:
Michael Stooksberry
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Triplett-Fazzone v. City of Columbus Division of Police, et al.,
as 2:2012cv00331
Plaintiff:
Ragna Triplett-Fazzone
Defendant:
City of Columbus Division of Police, et al., Franklin County Sheriff's Department, et al., The Sugar Bar, et al. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ury et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al. et al
as 1:2012dp20835
Plaintiff:
Brice Ury, Jr.
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., et al. , DePuy, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, et al. v. Basso
as 2:2012mc00015
Plaintiff:
Trustees of The National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund, et al.
Defendant:
Edward Basso
Miller v. CMHA, Security Division, Robert Walker, et al.
as 2:2012mc00011
Plaintiff:
Selina Miller, r
Defendant:
CMHA, Security Division, Robert Walker, et al.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
