Cases 41 - 50 of 254
APARANJI et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00409
Plaintiff:
SHRIRAMAN APARANJI and APARNA DESHPANDE
Defendant:
JEH JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., JAMES B. COMEY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
BREAKFIELD v. HOLDER
as 1:2015mc00313
Plaintiff:
JAMES EDWARD BREAKFIELD
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Complaint
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015mc00283
Petitioner:
AARON D. WILLIAMS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
Cause Of Action: Complaint
HARRIS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00270
Plaintiff:
MARCUS B. HARRIS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and JONATHAN M. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PRATHER (EL) v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00244
Plaintiff:
CLARENCE PRATHER (EL)
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., KIMBERLY J. DEL GRECO and CHUCK GRASSLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
ATTKISSON et al v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00238
Plaintiff:
SHARYL THOMPSON ATTKISSON , JAMES HOWARD ATTKISSON and SARAH JUDITH STARR ATTKISSON
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. , PATRICK R. DONAHOE , UNKNOWN NAMED AGENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MISHRA et al v. JOHNSON et al
as 1:2015cv00190
Plaintiff:
SAPNA MISHRA and ROHITH SHIVASWAMY
Defendant:
JEH CHARLES JOHNSON, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., LEON RODRIGUEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
STARK v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00202
Petitioner:
BRADLEY CHRISTOPHER STARK
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., RICHARD B. ROPER, JAMES T. JACKS and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
PHILLIPS v. HOLDER et al
as 1:2015cv00109
Plaintiff:
CHERRON MARIE PHILLIPS
Defendant:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR., MICHAEL J. REAGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
