Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Gritt et al v. Coachmen Industries, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv00067
Plaintiff:
Charles Gritt and Judith Gritt
Defendant:
Coachmen Industries, Inc. and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Reveiz et al v. Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC et al
as 3:2009cv00232
Plaintiff:
Bryanna G Reveiz, Bryanna G Reveiz, Gayle Reveiz and others
Defendant:
Jaguar Land Rover North America, LLC, Land Rover North America, Inc, Ford Motor Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Fillers v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2009cv00033
Plaintiff:
Clifford F Fillers
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2009cv00086
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson and Pamela Johnson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jones et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Josh Jones and Virginia Jones
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Stinson v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2008cv00996
Plaintiff:
Ronny V. Stinson
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Spencer et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 3:2008cv00361
Plaintiff:
Marvin Lee Spencer and Victoria Stripling
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Tatem et al v. Four Winds International Corporation et al
as 2:2008cv00208
Plaintiff:
Watson Tatem and Ivelisse Tatem
Defendant:
Four Winds International Corporation and Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Escudero v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2008cv00002
Plaintiff:
Rachel E. Escudero
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2007cv02653
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
