Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Cruz et al v. The City of New York (City) et al
as 1:2011cv08456
Plaintiff:
Chirstopher Cruz , Luis Lopez , Marcus Cruz and others
Defendant:
The City of New York (City) , The New York City Police Department (NYPD), Miguel Frias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frias et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv06839
Plaintiff:
Joel Frias and Mary Cruz Rincon
Defendant:
City of New York , Daniel Leon, Alex Munoz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frias v. Astrue
as 1:2011cv04255
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Plaintiff:
Richard E. Frias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Beltre v. Pyro Engineering, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv03793
Plaintiff:
Miguel Frias Beltre
Defendant:
Dennis Brady, Jr., Pyro Engineering, Inc., Charles Rappa and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
James v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv09606
Plaintiff:
Anthony James
Defendant:
The City of New York , Mohammed Karim, Railyng Frias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Pagan et al v. Riverbay Corporations et al
as 1:2010cv05490
Plaintiff:
Joanna Pagan and Salvadore Pagan
Defendant:
Riverbay Corporations , Jonathan Frias , Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez v. C Town Supermarket et al
as 1:2010cv02962
Plaintiff:
Fortino Acosta Hernandez
Defendant:
C Town Supermarket and Jose Frias
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Frias v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv05949
Plaintiff:
Sonia F. Frias
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Frias v. The City Of New York City et al
as 1:2008cv10875
Plaintiff:
Rafarl Frias
Defendant:
The City Of New York City, New York City Police Department, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frias-Castro v. USA
as 1:2008cv09803
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Santos Frias-Castro
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
