Cases 41 - 50 of 220
Metts v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00561
Petitioner:
Carmelita C Metts
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00551
Petitioner:
Shaquala Brown
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robey v. Garrett et al
as 7:2022cv00532
Petitioner:
Jessica Ann Robey
Respondent:
Garrett and Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Finan v. Garrett
as 7:2022cv00507
Petitioner:
Leah Jeanette Finan
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ricketts v. Garrett et al
as 7:2022cv00495
Petitioner:
Farren Ricketts
Respondent:
Garrett and Carvajal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garrett v. Sanofi US Services Inc et al
as 4:2022cv00481
Defendant:
Sanofi US Services Inc, Sanofi-Aventis US Inc and Sanofi-Aventis US LLC
Plaintiff:
Francis Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ellis v. United States of America et al
as 7:2022cv00334
Petitioner:
Priscilla A Ellis
Respondent:
United States of America, Warden Garrett, Director Carvajal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Garrett v. Brenning et al
as 1:2021cv00545
Plaintiff:
Christopher Garrett
Defendant:
Officer Brenning, C.O Dale, C.O Ephraim and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Primerica Life Insurance Company v. Eady et al
as 7:2021cv01648
Plaintiff:
Primerica Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Johnathan Douglas Eady, Phillip Brett Eady, Lori Anne Fulgham Eady and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Teryaeva-Reed v. Garrett
as 7:2021cv01643
Petitioner:
Julia Teryaeva-Reed
Respondent:
Chad Garrett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
