Cases 41 - 50 of 1,051
Goldman v. Hart et al
as 1:2024cv00175
Plaintiff:
Gary A. Goldman
Defendant:
Kim Hart and Gettel Woodstock, Inc doing business as Chrysler Dodge Jeep Ram of Woodstock
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
COFIELD v. LONG et al
as 5:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
RANDY EUGENE COFIELD
Defendant:
SHERIFF GARY LONG, SHAUN SOUTHERLAND, DENISE WARD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05904
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Davis v. Navarre et al
as 2:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Gary Davis
Defendant:
Francis Navarre, John Does 1 & 2 and Progressive Premier Insurance Company of Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
PREASTER v. WERNER ENTERPRISES INC et al
as 5:2023cv00506
Plaintiff:
Adrian Preaster
Defendant:
WERNER ENTERPRISES INC, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Gary M. Howard and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05764
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Cinamaker, Inc. v. Baker
as 1:2023cv05542
Plaintiff:
Cinamaker, Inc.
Defendant:
Gary Baker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
King v. Williams et al
as 1:2023cv05505
Plaintiff:
Mykel King
Defendant:
Gary Levine Williams, Hub Group Trucking, Inc., Ace American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
