Cases 41 - 50 of 144
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02861
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KNIGHT
as 2:2014cv00632
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
GAYLE L. KNIGHT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02217
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C. v. Burkett et al
as 3:2013cv03073
Plaintiff:
Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.
Defendant:
Russell E. Burkett and Gayle Burkett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ALLEN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05821
Plaintiff:
WILLIE ALLEN , DAISY ARNETT , JERRY ARP and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05831
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE JOHNSON , KEITH HUNDLEY , GAYLE WAUGH and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BRUNT v. COLVIN
as 2:2013cv05288
Plaintiff:
GAYLE R. BRUNT
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Demchak Partners Liimited Partnership et al v. Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.
as 3:2013cv02289
Plaintiff:
Demchak Partners Liimited Partnership , James P. Burger, Jr. , Barbara H. Burger and others
Defendant:
Chesapeake Appalachia, L.L.C.
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Russell Burkett , Gayle Burkett and Paul F Sidorek
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TERRELL v. DAVOL, INC. et al
as 2:2013cv05074
Plaintiff:
GAYLE TERRELL
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv03528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
