Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Perry v. Snyder
as 5:2007hc02122
Petitioner:
Frank Perry
Defendant:
George Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ford v. Snyder
as 5:2007hc02094
Petitioner:
Kevin Charles Ford, Sr.
Respondent:
George Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Porter v. Snyder et al
as 5:2007hc02093
Petitioner:
Kevin Porter
Respondent:
George Snyder and United States Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jackson v. US Parole Commission et al
as 5:2007hc02084
Petitioner:
Ainsworth C. Jackson
Defendant:
US Parole Commission and George Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
HOLLY v. CHRISTENSEN et al
as 1:2007cv00729
Plaintiff:
RICKY LEE HOLLY
Defendant:
THOMAS CHRISTENSEN, HARLEY LAPPIN, WILLIE SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey v. Snyder et al
as 5:2007hc02074
Petitioner:
Jerome Bailey
Defendant:
George Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Bailey v. Snyder et al
as 5:2007hc02066
Petitioner:
Jerome Bailey
Defendant:
George Snyder and Harley Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Simms v. Snyder et al
as 5:2007hc02061
Petitioner:
Wilbert C. Simms
Respondent:
George Snyder
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
SANTIAGO v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2007cv00528
Plaintiff:
BERNARDO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, SCOTT STERMER, HARRELL WATTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FORD v. SNYDER
as 1:2007cv00542
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHARLES FORD, SR.
Respondent:
GEORGE SNYDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
