Cases 41 - 50 of 62
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00948
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1101
Geist v. Newsome et al
as 3:2018cv00094
Plaintiff:
Amy Elizabeth Geist
Defendant:
Reginald Wayne Newsome, American Psychiatric Association, HCA Virginia Health Systems and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gomez et al v. Cho et al
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Brenda Gomez and Edvin Enrique Lemus
Defendant:
Suk Hong Cho, Sun Young Cho and Tyco Cleaners, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carollo et al v. De La Cruz Santillan et al
as 1:2016cv01585
Plaintiff:
Juana Acre Carollo , Lourdes Barrenechea , Carmen Yeleni Licona and others
Defendant:
Robert P. Saldivar, Michelle Meehan Bloxton, Jeff Bloxton and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv01433
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Canales et al v. Katchmark Construction, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv01041
Plaintiff:
Jose Danilo Gomez Canales , Romel Carias Calix and Roni Javier Gonzales Suazo
Defendant:
Katchmark Construction, Inc. and Stephen Katchmark
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gomez Amaya v. C&L Enterprise, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00573
Plaintiff:
Josue Antonio Gomez Amaya
Defendant:
C&L Enterprise, Inc. and Sai Ying Zheng
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Castillo-Gomez v. Convenience Car Care Center, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00651
Plaintiff:
Domingo Castillo-Gomez
Defendant:
Convenience Car Care Center, Inc. , Timothy J. Tyrrell and William D. Tyrrell, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
