Cases 41 - 50 of 1,250
Chambliss v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00447
Petitioner:
Raheem Chambliss
Respondent:
Lt. Bray, Sheriff Milum and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00346
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lassiter v. Clarke
as 2:2023cv00349
Petitioner:
Randy Lee Lassiter, Jr.
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mitchell v. Clarke
as 3:2023cv00444
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Jamel Mitchell
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Peterson v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00417
Petitioner:
Michael Andrew Peterson
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bonds v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00415
Petitioner:
Durwin Evant Bonds, Jr.
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Manzo-Hernandez v. Clarke
as 7:2023cv00414
Plaintiff:
Francisco Manzo-Hernandez
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. Harold W. Clarke et al
as 7:2023cv00403
Petitioner:
Nicholas Alan Jenkins
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Buchanan County Circuit Court and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blake v. Holloway et al
as 7:2023cv00381
Plaintiff:
Isaw Waleed Blake
Defendant:
Mr. Holloway, Mr. Harold W. Clarke, Mss. E. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pulley v. Zoley et al
as 1:2023cv00846
Plaintiff:
Jason Pulley
Defendant:
George Zoley and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
